Thursday, 30 January 2014

My Grave, My Identity



In my Mortuary Anthropology class we’ve been focusing a lot on identity – what the graves say about the people in them, and what the graves say about those that buried the dead. Archeologists tend to focus on grave goods when studying identity in a funerary context. It’s really interesting what information Archeologists are able to interpret from grave goods – they can draw conclusions on the deceased’s preferences, social status, profession, familial role or where they may have travelled. It all gets a bit messy though when you really consider that the deceased did not bury themselves. It seems really obvious – but those burying the dead could represent the dead in a way that was not attune to their living identity. 

The professor of my Mortuary Archeology class posed a question asking us what we would like to be included in our burial, and what our friends and family may choose to include in our burial. I had never thought about my own burial – I found this question difficult! How can I properly express my identity in a few material items? It was sobering – I realized that I have developed the habit of making absolute deductions about the identity of the deceased that I’ve studied, based on their grave goods. It’s important for me to remember that I am analyzing complex and unique individuals.
Even though I have my doubts about completely expressing my identity to future archeologists through grave goods, I am up to the challenge. I asked friends and family what they would include in my grave:

My mother: after her initial alarm about my question, she said she would include my running shoes, cinnamon sticks and a world map because of my love of travel. I loved all of her suggestions. I really enjoy running (I’m training for my first half-marathon right now!) and I feel like it is a big part of my identity now – I consider myself a runner. I am cinnamon obsessed (my portions of cinnamon will burn your tongue) and I love to explore new places – I’ve always been travel obsessed. All of her suggestions said something about my aspirations, preferences and past times. Good job mom!

My father: He was not alarmed by my question, which to me is alarming in itself. Anyway, he said he would bury me with “those weird seedy things you eat that look like bird food” (I think he means chia seeds), Disneyland entrance passes and books.  These are fabulous suggestions too – I am quite health conscious, and the chia seeds represent that (super food!). Some of my happiest memories with my family are at Disneyland. My dad and I would ride the Matterhorn for hours. The books are a great suggestion too. I am a vicarious reader (well, as much as my University work load will allow) and I’d like to somehow represent my love for reading in my grave. My dad nailed it.

My boyfriend: I think he thought this was a test or something when I asked him what he would bury me with. I think he thought I had read in a magazine that told me this question would provide insight to our relationship. Too funny. He said he would bury me with my yoga mat, dark chocolate, and some of the pictures that he’s drawn for me. I was really fond of his suggestions. I practice Bikram yoga and I really enjoy it. I also absolutely love dark chocolate so including it in my grave is a must. The pictures were a wonderful suggestion too – I love them so much.

My roommates/best friends: I’m live with four girls, and they are some of my best friends. I posed the question to all four of them, and they seemed way too into it (which is worrisome). Aside from their silly suggestions, they said they would bury me with white wine, tea, coffee (but the coffee has to be buried with me in some way so the archeologist know that I drink it black) and my big scarves that I love so much. Their suggestions were very liquid focused, but spot on. I drink countless cups of tea a day, and I pretty much consume a trough of coffee every morning. I do love my scarves, but I am not sure I would want to be buried with them. I think I’d rather go for a nice dress or something.

All in all, my friends and family seemed to hit the nail spot on. I don’t know what else I would include in my grave to express my identity. Except for sushi – I would include sushi. A lot of sushi. It wouldn’t keep well of course, but having it in there is a must. It will be a full grave – but I don’t want to part with anything that my family and friends suggested. 

I don’t know how much these grave goods would express my identity. They certainly show what I love to do with my time, and what some of my aspirations are. It’s just weird to express something as complex as identity in grave goods. I’m also concerned about how this will all be interpreted by future archeologist – maybe they’ll think that I’m an aritist-extraordinare,  yoga-guru, with strong Japanese ties when I’m really a leisurely yogi with a nice boyfriend that eats too much sushi. We will see though. I don’t want my apprehensions come off as me having little faith in archeological interpretation – I think what archeologists do is amazing, critical and incredibly important. I believe that archeologists make correct and astute interpretations from mortuary finds. But I think it’s natural to feel a little nervous when it is your own identity that is being interpreted. This thought exercise has delivered an important archeological lesson for me – I so often so at grave goods and think about them in a group context (e.x. what does this say about the society that this individual is part of?) rather than analyzing grave goods in an individual context and really thinking about what the grave goods say about the person. I’ll work on that though – I am sure there is a happy medium between group and individual interpretations.

Sunday, 26 January 2014

Weekend Warrior

I recently completed a class project that involved researching local cemeteries. I knew nothing about any of the cemeteries in my area (and it turns out there are a lot). Cemeteries, to be honest, really creep me out. In a cemetery death is so apparent. It always made me feel a little unsettled - I'm constantly being reminded of my own impending (but hopefully far-off) death. Which is not super fun, in my humble opinion. 

This weekend I was on a walk and I realized that I was right the Ross Bay cemetery, which I had just been researching online. It is a Victorian-era cemetery, often celebrated for its natural beauty and impressive monuments. It has some unsavoury history too -- the cemetery is largely segregated on the basis of race and income. 

Ross Bay Cemetery
Image via flickriver user wild prairie man


As I approached the entrance to the cemetery I knew I had to go in a take a look around. I would have been such a missed opportunity if I hadn't - it was literally right in front of me, and internet research can only get you so far. In a way, going into the cemetery was a tool of self-betterment. If I want to be an archeologist, I should probably work on becoming more comfortable with death. 

Image via flickr user ai.dan

At first, I found the cemetery quite eerie. It was also incredibly foggy this weekend, which only contributed to the ghostly atmosphere. However, after walking around I felt myself feeling far more calm and peaceful. It really is a beautiful place -- the Victorian monuments are stunning, and the natural beauty of the cemetery is impressive. Although it is a place of death, it doesn't necessarily feel "deathly". Being there conjured up feelings of remembrance and commemoration. The deathly aspect of the cemetery felt like a side-thought: it seemed like remembering and respecting life was of key importance.

 Something that surprised me was the obvious segregation in the cemetery - of course I knew it was segregated by my online research, but for some reason the transparency of the segregation shocked me. Sections of the cemetery were clear: Anglican plots over here, Chinese plots over there, and so on. The Ross Bay Cemetery is a celebrated landmark, and it is discomforting that more attention is not paid to addressing discriminatory aspects of the cemetery. Most of the online sources I consulted about Ross Bay Cemetery speak about it's beauty and tranquility. It's difficult to come to terms with the colonial outlook and the discrimination that the cemetery was established upon. It made me feel uncomfortable at an individual level for almost enjoying walking through the cemetery, and at a more societal level, as the Ross Bay Cemetery is quite celebrated.



Image via access Victoria



Despite my feelings of unease, I am happy that I walked through the cemetery. Critical reflection is important. Additionally, I certainly feel less creeped out by cemeteries now! Perhaps in the future I'll return to the Ross Bay Cemetery and analyze it in a more critical manner. 

Thursday, 16 January 2014

What I'm dying to know

I fully apologize for the terrible pun in the title. I just can’t help myself sometimes. 

As I alluded to in a previous post, this blog was created for an “Archeology of death and burial” course I am currently taking. It is an incredibly interesting topic, and I am really looking forward to learning more about other culture’s funerary practices, as well as examining my own culture’s with greater detail. We will be studying a vast array of topics, including theoretical frameworks to study burial remains, treatment of the dead, Anglo-Saxon cremations, Egyptian funerary practices, Neanderthal burial patterns, the ethics and politics regarding human remains, and much more.

I am especially looking forward to analyzing Egyptian burial practices. When I was younger, I went through a bit of an “Egypt phase,” and I’ve since then I have been interested in Egyptian culture. I saw an IMAX program on King Tut, and I quickly spiralled into a full-blown obsession (two weeks later I moved onto sharks). To me, ancient egyptian culture was exotic, mysterious and enthralling. My knowledge of their funerary practices is incredibly fragmentary -- it’ is mostly amalgamated from grade four research, the odd discovery program, and museum visits.  Today I am particularly interested in learning about the reasoning behind the Ancient Egyptian’s funerary practices, and how they evolved throughout time. 

Ancient Egyptian archeology finds have been in the news lately, check out these links if you’d like to do a bit of reading on the latest research!




Tuesday, 14 January 2014

Did you know...

That it was common in Mayan funerary practices to place a piece of maize in the deceased's mouth. Researchers speculate that this ritual was carried out for two reasons. Firstly, the maize was considered nourishment for the dead during their passage to the afterlife. Secondly, maize was a highly important crop to the mayans - a lot of meanings were attributed to it, including rebirth.


Mayan Maize God
Image via the British Museum 


Of course, this particular burial behaviour cannot be attributed to all Mayans - at their peak, they represented a huge population! 

Monday, 13 January 2014

Neanderthals, Neanderthals, Neanderthals

About a month ago, the popular media widely published finding from a 1999-2012 re-excavation of a Neanderthal grave site in La Chapelle-aux-Saints, France. Neanderthal news usually stirs up a lot of media attention, but this site in particular really seemed to capture the public's attention. What was, and is, so interesting about this Neanderthal grave site was the presence of intentional burial. According to researchers, the 50,000 year old skeleton was intentionally buried by his companions. The study of symbolic thought, cognition, and culture of Neanderthals  have been big topics in Palaeolithic archeology. These findings present some pretty hard hitting evidence that the Neanderthals were capable of complex thought -- something which is (very unfairly) not often attributed to them by the popular media.

La Chapelle-aux-Saints grave site
Image via "Liberty Voice"

I love how this finding shows the true universality of concern for the deceased. Although I cannot speculate on why the Neanderthals in this case chose to bury their deceased counterpart (perhaps they were worried about scavenging animals, maybe the site of death left them feeling uncomfortable, or possibly it was an action of care) this finding, for me, hi-lights that processing the dead is a trans-cultural and trans-historical process, and can lead to postulations about cultural and symbolic nature.


Reconstruction of the La Chapelle-aux-Saints burial
Image via National Geographic


What are your thought on the findings of this intentional Neanderthal burial? 


If you are interested in reading more on this topic, check out these news articles:





  

Sunday, 12 January 2014

A little bit about me

This blog is dedicated to musings on death, graves, and burial from an archeological perspective.  I am currently in the third year of my anthropology undergrad. I've loved it so far, and I'm looking forward to digging a little deeper (no pun intended) into other cultures' death and burial practices! Posts will include deeper discussions pertaining to the material from the "Archeology of Death" course I am currently taking, as well as small posts (news headlines, "fun" facts, etc.) concerning death and burial.

Stay tuned for more updates!